Jump to content


Photo

amazing 9/11 poll regarding WTC Building 7


  • Please log in to reply
106 replies to this topic

Poll: did WTC 7 collapse due to a controlled demolition? (18 member(s) have cast votes)

did WTC 7 collapse due to a controlled demolition?

  1. yes, it was a controlled demolition (9 votes [50.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  2. no, there was no controlled demolition (9 votes [50.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#41 trickz

trickz

    Major

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,450 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Gold Captain

Posted 01 May 2016 - 12:07 PM

Yo to all the planecrash-believers,

 

 

It's insane crap, believe it

and your lame "facts"-achievements?

A waste lads, just see this

cuz' the main trash that feeded

thise case back when needed

has been broken down a long time ago by science, your claim's wack so beat it! :D 

I'm gona provide you a link with straight facts to teach kids,

it ain't that a secret

and I dare you to say that it's weak sh..!  :P

 

This is not an article about a liar who tells,...

that planes destruct buildings,...not a chance, bulletproof, fire as well!

Common sense disappeared, education is cryin' for help

so get out of your dreams and don't hide in your shell

and read the SCIENCEFACTS which you can admire yourself!  ;)

 

http://911research.w...wtc/how-hot.htm


I love the smell of Napalm in the morning

#42 Walhall

Walhall

    Bomb

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 68 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum Colonel

Posted 02 May 2016 - 05:09 PM

 

they should have used Saudi passports instead of steel beams to build these skyscrapers  :lol:


Edited by Walhall, 02 May 2016 - 05:09 PM.


#43 GaryLShelton

GaryLShelton

    Marshal

  • Moderators
  • 4,063 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Gold Miner

Posted 03 May 2016 - 06:25 AM

Nice link, trickz.
The complete GS&F Rules can be found here: http://forum.strateg...rum-rules-2016/

Draw Refusal Rules, specifically, can be read here: http://forum.strateg...604#entry339604

#44 astros

astros

    Major

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,224 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum Scout

Posted 05 May 2016 - 06:16 PM

The government is too busy covering up the fact that the earth is flat to be involved in this nonsense.

Edited by astros, 05 May 2016 - 06:17 PM.

  • Lonello and hondjekapitein like this
3 - 0

#45 Walhall

Walhall

    Bomb

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 68 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum Colonel

Posted 22 May 2016 - 06:34 PM

TerrorisT voted, check it out!



#46 Fairway

Fairway

    General

  • Junior Tournament Management
  • 2,240 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Gold Scout

Posted 23 May 2016 - 08:59 PM

TerrorisT voted, check it out!

Thanks Sherlock :)


  • TerrorisT likes this
I'm always a winner- win or lose the game. I take my mistakes and learn from them!

#47 GeneralPlatinski

GeneralPlatinski

    New Recruit

  • Banned
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Bronze Spy

Posted 03 September 2016 - 12:15 PM

it hits the mainstream:

 

Europhysics Magazine, the respected publication of the European physics community,
 finds Twin Towers brought down by 'controlled demolition'.


http://www.wnd.com/2...ysicists-study/

 

 



#48 trickz

trickz

    Major

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,450 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Gold Captain

Posted 03 September 2016 - 02:23 PM

it hits the mainstream:

 

Europhysics Magazine, the respected publication of the European physics community,
 finds Twin Towers brought down by 'controlled demolition'.


http://www.wnd.com/2...ysicists-study/

 

Pretty obvious conclusion indeed ;)


I love the smell of Napalm in the morning

#49 TheOptician

TheOptician

    General

  • Tournament Manager
  • 2,154 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum General

Posted 03 September 2016 - 04:14 PM

http://www.collectiv...mission-report/

 

This video is fairly compelling. At first I thought it insensitive simply to consider the possibility of controlled demolition, but any view should be determined by the evidence alone. I'd be interested to hear a proper response in argument to the points raised in this video.



#50 astros

astros

    Major

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,224 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum Scout

Posted 03 September 2016 - 07:15 PM

http://www.collectiv...mission-report/

 

This video is fairly compelling. At first I thought it insensitive simply to consider the possibility of controlled demolition, but any view should be determined by the evidence alone. I'd be interested to hear a proper response in argument to the points raised in this video.

Two general points.

 

There are roughly 2 million engineers in the US. These guys represent .1 percent of engineers. This is less than the number of doctors who believe vaccines are unsafe or biologists who reject Darwinian evolution. There will be professionals in any field who reject mainstream ideas that does not mean they are in the majority or are right.

 

Let's say hypothetically the US government brought down both towers. Ignoring whatever their motivations might be for doing so, there is no way this could be kept secret for this long. Someone involved would have blown the whistle on an operation that killed 3,000 people. The US government is not that good at covering up scandals and there is no way something of this magnitude could have been concealed.


3 - 0

#51 TheOptician

TheOptician

    General

  • Tournament Manager
  • 2,154 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum General

Posted 03 September 2016 - 08:02 PM

Point 1 is fair enough, but you have to consider the stigma attached to supporting this hypothesis, which will greatly reduce the amount of people who even begin to consider entertaining it as a possibility.

 

As for Point 2, the building being taken down by a controlled demolition doesn't necessarily implicate the US government.



#52 astros

astros

    Major

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,224 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum Scout

Posted 03 September 2016 - 08:09 PM

Point 1 is fair enough, but you have to consider the stigma attached to supporting this hypothesis, which will greatly reduce the amount of people who even begin to consider entertaining it as a possibility.

 

As for Point 2, the building being taken down by a controlled demolition doesn't necessarily implicate the US government.

If the US government did not orchestrate the controlled demolition, then who did?


3 - 0

#53 TheOptician

TheOptician

    General

  • Tournament Manager
  • 2,154 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum General

Posted 03 September 2016 - 08:14 PM

A terrorist group perhaps, or a group financially motivated to benefit from plunging markets. 



#54 astros

astros

    Major

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,224 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum Scout

Posted 03 September 2016 - 08:18 PM

Someone shorting a bunch of stocks on 9/11 would be caught and the US government would release information if terrorists were responsible. Maybe I am a sheeple, baaaahhhhh I do not find it credible that this would still be hidden at this point.


3 - 0

#55 TheOptician

TheOptician

    General

  • Tournament Manager
  • 2,154 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum General

Posted 03 September 2016 - 09:02 PM

I find the evidence compelling that Building 7 was a controlled demolition. As for who and why, that's not something that can be addressed without speculation.

Did you watch the video I posted?

#56 astros

astros

    Major

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,224 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum Scout

Posted 03 September 2016 - 09:19 PM

Yes I did.


3 - 0

#57 TheOptician

TheOptician

    General

  • Tournament Manager
  • 2,154 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum General

Posted 03 September 2016 - 10:11 PM

This one is an hour long, but answers your question as to who. It's not comfortable to watch.

 

https://www.youtube....h?v=n3xgjxJwedA



#58 GeneralPlatinski

GeneralPlatinski

    New Recruit

  • Banned
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Bronze Spy

Posted 04 September 2016 - 04:44 PM

http://www.collectiv...mission-report/

 

This video is fairly compelling. At first I thought it insensitive simply to consider the possibility of controlled demolition, but any view should be determined by the evidence alone. I'd be interested to hear a proper response in argument to the points raised in this video.

TheOptician flipped. What a nutjob! :D
quKcvxY.jpg
Welcome to the club!



#59 GeneralPlatinski

GeneralPlatinski

    New Recruit

  • Banned
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Bronze Spy

Posted 04 September 2016 - 04:53 PM

Someone shorting a bunch of stocks on 9/11 would be caught and the US government would release information if terrorists were responsible. Maybe I am a sheeple, baaaahhhhh I do not find it credible that this would still be hidden at this point.

Sounds like you are getting a tiny doubt in the official version? Suffocate it fast, otherwise it will grow from day to day!



#60 TheOptician

TheOptician

    General

  • Tournament Manager
  • 2,154 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum General

Posted 04 September 2016 - 05:05 PM

>Someone shorting a bunch of stocks on 9/11 would be caught 

 

Not if the building that would be due to investigate such actions had their main data in Building 7....

 

>Welcome to the club!

Thanks (not sure its a great club to be in)






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users