I really have the feeling that people isn't properly against me, but against the fact that my father was a moderator and this is not right to me… I would understand if Napo1 had asked to become moderator again, but this is not the case, I am another person…
You stated you & N1 have the same interest in improvements. It is basically N1 again. People want to hear/see that you think you'll do a better job than N1. Many will perceive that this is not a difficult goal to achieve, but those who were not happy with N1, will not be happy with someone promising more of the same.
The fact that I'm living with him shouldn't be a point to decide if I can or not become a moderator, as I have already said, e are very separated on this site, both of us say their thoughts, we make our own pairing in the tourney and play our games without switching accounts to eachothers, I Don't see why, if I become a moderator, I should ask him to do my job as it is me who had chosen to answer the open call to become moderator.
Some may feel that this can put you in a tough spot, and also potentially be influenced by N1. I don't think this would be the case, but it is a burden you can not possibly overcome against the critics.
a) Let's start my first plan with a little story which could allow some of you to know me a bit better, I want to become a scientist policeman ( so the guy who makes the analysis for the police) ; I want to do this because i guess it is not "cool" that there are victims and people doing what they want trough laws. Here it is more or less the same thing (probably less drammatic) but I guess that a victim of an abuse will slowly lose the willing to play the game while the abuser will increase all the time. So I engage myself to spend my time to work on it and make a way to allow the victim to enjoy the game again like if Nothing happened and convince the abuser not to start again.
This one is still to be determinated, but it would be to focus on promoting dissuasive rules, with this I mean that it could be nice to ask the creators of the game to add a page in the screen menu of stratego (where you have chat, players friends,....) which would be rules, where it explain better what is allowed and what isn't writing the penality there are. In that way, I think some abuser or future abuser would maybe think twice before ruining a match.
We have the GS&FR (General Site & Forum Rules). Upon infringements, people are sent a warning letter which explains that their displayed behavior has led to this and that continuation of such behavior will result into more severe sanctions. How would you improve that? (besides textual changes). Adding those players to your friendlist and talking to them (if you even meet them at the same time..) will tire you out. Note that MT has not much say over pages/menus etc)
c) If it is possible to get in touch with the creators, add a new league, like "legen" or "champion" or another name that the Community could like for players over 1000+ or 900+ if it is better to keep going with steps of 20 points.
Small cosmetic thing. This isn't really convincing I think.