Jump to content


Photo

Astros Stratego Series Questions


  • Please log in to reply
51 replies to this topic

#41 Henry domerkant

Henry domerkant

    Lieutenant

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 683 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum Miner

Posted 26 June 2018 - 06:53 AM

I think that a good idea would be more than one player to gain the immunity becauase the goal should be to see the good players remaning on the game
How about that?

#42 Fairway

Fairway

    General

  • Junior Tournament Management
  • 2,782 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum Spy

Posted 02 July 2018 - 06:43 PM

Henry received four points and Napo received four. Why is Napo eliminated? How is this determined?


WINNER of the first ever Astros Stratego Series!  :D


#43 Fks

Fks

    Major

  • NASF Committee
  • 1,063 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum Marshal

Posted 02 July 2018 - 06:48 PM

Henry received four points and Napo received four. Why is Napo eliminated? How is this determined?

There where 5 votes on napo, the last one where astros says who is eliminated is a vote.


Proud Member of the North American Stratego Federation (NASF)

http://forum.strateg...18/#entry461226


#44 Fairway

Fairway

    General

  • Junior Tournament Management
  • 2,782 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum Spy

Posted 02 July 2018 - 06:50 PM

If that is a vote then he needs to read it off with the other votes as that's very confusing instead of announcing that Napo is the loser with a 4-4 tie (as least that's what it seems to me)


  • Fks likes this

WINNER of the first ever Astros Stratego Series!  :D


#45 astros

astros

    Stratego TM

  • WC Online Team
  • 768 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum Colonel

Posted 02 July 2018 - 06:58 PM

The last name read is always a vote. Napoleon was voted out 5-4.
I'm in love with Stacy's mom.

#46 Henry domerkant

Henry domerkant

    Lieutenant

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 683 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum Miner

Posted 11 August 2018 - 09:49 PM

On the next round ( top 3 players)
Will it be again one only immunity and then voting where in essence the player who gets immunity will choose his opponent to the final or the two best players on the challenge will progress to the final without voting?

#47 steelers

steelers

    Sergeant

  • Tournament Manager
  • 453 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Gold Captain

Posted 11 August 2018 - 09:53 PM

I believe whoever wins immunity next round will in effect have the only vote that matters (since the other 2 would have to vote for each other).  So I believe whoever wins immunity next round will in effect choose who they go to the finals with. But I'll let Astros answer to make sure I'm correct. 



#48 astros

astros

    Stratego TM

  • WC Online Team
  • 768 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum Colonel

Posted 11 August 2018 - 09:55 PM

Yes, whoever wins immunity next round gets to choose who they face in the finals.
  • Henry domerkant likes this
I'm in love with Stacy's mom.

#49 Fks

Fks

    Major

  • NASF Committee
  • 1,063 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum Marshal

Posted 14 August 2018 - 01:26 AM

Who are the players who get to vote in the end?

Proud Member of the North American Stratego Federation (NASF)

http://forum.strateg...18/#entry461226


#50 steelers

steelers

    Sergeant

  • Tournament Manager
  • 453 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Gold Captain

Posted 14 August 2018 - 01:28 AM

I believe it is everyone who got eliminated from Napoleon on.


  • Henry domerkant likes this

#51 steelers

steelers

    Sergeant

  • Tournament Manager
  • 453 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Gold Captain

Posted 14 August 2018 - 01:45 AM

Will the jury vote publicly for the finals and be able to give our reasoning, or will it be an anonymous tribal council like the others?



#52 astros

astros

    Stratego TM

  • WC Online Team
  • 768 posts
  • Coat of arms
  • Platinum Colonel

Posted 14 August 2018 - 01:53 AM

The format will be explained after tonight's vote.
I'm in love with Stacy's mom.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users