This must be some kind of a joke, and not a funny one at all. You want to be considered for a position on the MT, but you clearly have no ability to answer questions effectively, thoroughly, or with evidence of even having understood the question being asked.
Your answer to question #1 is nothing more than a mere deflection and is unsatisfactory.
You completely fail to understand and to answer properly question #2–this alone is enough to disqualify you.
Question #3 is answered with a "maybe" but nothing indicating any conviction, strength, or vision.
Question #4 is, again, answered passively as you would prefer to wait to hear from someone else. WHY WOULD YOU WAIT?!?!? If you were an MT, you would be in a position to propose ideas to your colleagues, but it takes vision, understanding, tenacity, and imagination–strength helps to bind some of these things, but your passivity in answering demonstrates an absolute lack of leadership quality.
Your answer to question #5 starts off with "I don't know." This is not how an MT would respond.
You start to answer question #6, but then you waggle on both sides of the coin and leave the question with NO answer at all.
This is an atrocious example of failing to answer successfully very basic questions, and I flat out refuse to endorse anyone who can submit this kind of writing thinking that they have fulfilled some kind of quality work–this is embarrassing. Why am I so passionate about posting this material? Because the forum has gone through a HUGE blood-letting episode and needs everyone to pull together with a common goal of resuscitating this place. Being considered as an MT candidate is no laughing matter, and there is nothing casual about it, but when someone has the idea, "Oh gee, I think I'd like to be an MT," but cannot even answer effectively to any acceptable degree basic questions, then this flies right in the face of building a better now and future.