Yes, he has clarified his position. I asked him to rectify the dirty crimes as it heavily implies using dishonest tactics in order to gain advantages. As a 4 times live WC and 10 times Dutch champion, I do not wish to be associated with any "dirty tactics". It's like accusing a winner of the tour de france of doping.
I also asked him to rectify another libelous comment
"First you harass our Greek MT-member last week up to the point he even resigns, for so much as opening an PM thread discussing some fun in ALTERNATIVE PLAYING OPTIONS. After all that abuse we had to talk like Brugman, as the Dutch call that, to keep him in MT. While the young man has just been appointed!" http://forum.strateg...he-mt/?p=447094
This statement holds exactly 0% truth regarding the things I am accused of here. Again, no rectification.
To your comments:
1. He directly addresses me by naming it "Nortrom's crimes"
2. By addressing me together with "misdeeds", he makes it appear that I was involved in those "misdeeds". I don't care whether it's a law/rule broken or not. It's like saying "well, you laughed at a hungry homeless man but its not against the law!"
3. Yes. I have offered my help, so far it has not been accepted. In fact I'd like to inform you that 6 months ago, after discussion on the forum about the pros and cons, I held a poll (24 : 1 in favor) whether ISF anti-multiple chasing should be enforced. Now I believe it was question 9 of this abomination called "Survey" that asked the same question, again. I also like to mention that in a PM with the MT about this topic, after several weeks I gave up on them. There is either a clear lack of will or just plain incompetence.
5. Incorrect. He says I can not be burdened with more than one tourney as volunteering work, whether I am currently involved with one (WCO) or multiple activities does not matter (and I am involved in more, so even then, it still is an incorrect and hurtful statement, essentially discreditting my effort and making it look like I am not willing to help out). You can call it a hyperbole if that makes lonello sleep better.
6. No idea. I don't know of any pictures removed or not. If so, I was not informed and I don't feel like checking all my posts to try to find the missing picture.
7. Lonello says "with as only goal to keep this an unbiased and impartial forum which goal we have clear knowledge of the opposing party has not."
- MT / Admin goal: Unbiased and impartial forum
- "Opposing party goal": Not unbiased or/and impartial forum
As per usual, no facts are presented to backup this claim. Since "Clear knowledge" is mentioned, it would be interesting to see this "clear knowledge", preferably with atleast one factual statement.
8. I never implied that he claimed I posted pornographic material on the forum. Empty statement.
9. He says that the new MT (which I would be part of in his doom scenario) , this new MT (not even regular members, thus preferential treatment) would be allowed to:
- Post pornographic material
- Post vulgarity
Again, you can call it a hyperbole. I prefer to look at what's actually being said.