Nortrom, I read through those quotes and the whole thread again. I can't comment on every exact detail due to a lack of knowledge about older forum events, but here is what I have to offer:
-" If he did not, he could have rectified it when I challenged his statements "
He has clarified his position on a few statements throughout the topic, such as here
which clarified on the first paragraph of this post
and others within the same topic speculating on the restoration of powers.
Lonello has not addressed every single point. Some points have been addressed instead by other MT members from what I can see. Lonello also stated he would rather 'stop commenting' and thus stop defending himself: here
-"but I am witness to Nortrom's crimes live. Very dirty."
I think here Lonello uses the word 'crimes' figuratively to refer to your team's misdeeds rather than literally. He is not implying that you have broken any laws.
It seems he is referring to a Dutch tournament. Unfortunately I do not know anything about that so my insight is extremely limited.
-"Always demanding things but as asked of him earlier, then you should also deliver. But he can't be burdened with anything more than 1 tourney as volunteering work and with Elections chosen next to a couple of electees from current MT he said he'd leave at the spot, leaving the workload to the remaining ones."
Lonello is referring to your debates and criticisms including asking certain MT members to step down. For example this , and your satirical StrategoDale posts which are a subtle lighthearted jab at the MT.
Lonello is of the opinion that one should be expected to step up and willing to help out if that user is criticizing something heavily. That's why he says "but you should also deliver" [to the MT].
The comment about "only running one tournament" is hyperbole. Though technically at the moment you are only involved in the organization of one event, the WCO, in the past you have accomplished much more than most ever will.
-"The only attitude I have in my entire life is act outspoken against bullying which is why you see me responding more but in MT and with Admin we have had only unanimous decisions with as only goal to keep this an unbiased and impartial forum which goal we have clear knowledge of the opposing party has not."
In the last paragraph before the aforementioned quote, Lonello talks about a picture -- presumably a middle finger sign -- posted on the forum that was later removed.
I interpret the 'unanimous verdict' comment to refer to that specific incident. The picture was removed, but you was not punished. Of course I am not on the MT so I can not categorically state whether my hypothesis, about that incident being a 'unaminous verdict' is indeed correct.
Naturally, the MT will not agree upon everything, so the MT functions with a team vote to eventually decide the best course of action for the cases the MT can handle.
-"Then once in power, this new MT will consist of 5 clones of Sadistic trainees: that new MT can swear along, use pornographic material and vulgarity as much as they want and fully biased warmonger the arch enemy out, for that would be an upgrade from current MT. That is their logic, as envisioned here on the forum. Well, good luck with that."
Lonello uses hyperbole here. He does not mean for such comments to be taken literally out of context.
He is never claimed that you have posted pornographic material on the forum.
He is perhaps insinuating that Sadistic has at some point done all of those things. I do not know for sure, however. So I can not confirm nor deny the veracity of those claims in that paragraph. You will have to wait for clarification from Lonello, I can only offer my own interpretations whether right or wrong.
If you have any further quotes or any additional queries I will check them out. As repeated from my final paragraph, I am only offering my own interpretations for these quotes as you have personally requested. I can not state for certain that this is what Lonello's posts were intended to mean.
I firmly believe that Lonello does not intend to have said 'false facts' deliberately. I agree that some posts may be misunderstood or ambiguous, however, I do not think that Lonello has any nefarious motives.
Edited by MTinsley, 10 March 2018 - 12:35 AM.